Devido a termos recebido um esclarecimento da Google para melhor compreensão do conteúdo de uma notícia por nós publicada, decidimos dar a conhecer o mesmo na integra.
O pedido surge no seguimento da nossa notícia publicada a 3 de Fevereiro, com o título “Google admite que não consegue filtrar as 300 horas de video que são enviados por minuto.“
Assim a Google esclarece:
Retomando o nosso artigo
O YouTube / Google não pré-visualiza os vídeos, mas sim revê revê os vídeos assim que os mesmos sejam marcados.
Segue o comunicado original da Associated Press:
Internet giant Google said Wednesday that the sheer volume of video on its YouTube website makes it tough to catch all terror related content, complicating the struggle to halt the spread of terrorist propaganda and hostage footage. Google Public Policy Manager Verity Harding said that about 300 hours of video material is being uploaded to YouTube every minute. She told a European Parliament meeting of the ALDE liberal group on a counter-terrorism action plan that “to pre-screen those videos before they are uploaded would be like screening a phone call before it’s made.” The European Union’s counter-terror chief believes it’s time to help companies to contain the security risk by having experts from member states flagging terror-related content. “We have to help them, and refer to them, and signal content,” Gilles De Kerchove said. “Each member state should have a unit with people trained to do that.” On YouTube, users can highlight problem videos and have them reviewed by a member of staff. When a Scotland Yard unit recently told Google about material that did not comply with the company’s own guidelines, De Kerchove said 93 percent of that content was removed. But when individuals flag up problems only a third of it is taken down. Detecting violent, extreme and racist material is a mammoth task. But concerted, targeted warnings from organized groups work best. “There are community groups and others who do this on a larger scale and they’re incredibly helpful to us,” Harding said. Despite the serious threat posed by extreme and violent videos, neither the big Internet companies nor the European Union appear willing to take on a legal battle to enforce their removal. “We can contemplate legislation but I suspect it would be an awfully monumental exercise,” De Kerchove said.
De referir que em parte nenhuma da nossa notícia original era referido que a Google pré-visualizava os vídeos, sendo que o termo usado foi “filtrar”, o que eventualmente terá sido o motivo pelo qual a Google achou que poderia ficar a situação mal esclarecida.
Independentemente de tal, esperamos que a situação seja agora clara!